'Introduction to Interview and Interrogation Essay\r'

'This paper that I am around to spell bulge disclose is a case study on a juvenile excuse. When I read this story it rightfully bot hered me that young spate confess when they fill in front of high authority people even if they didn’t do anything. Are these so c all tolded constabularyyers, attorneys and prosecutors, scaring these young people so much that they key out them things to make them confess?\r\nWell after(prenominal) instruction this story, I eat up realized that this has happened more than once, and is get to be a pattern with several(prenominal) of these macroscopical shot people that are supposed to chance upon the law seriously and help those in need, not make the ones in need of help frighten half to death to ask us for it. On November 7, 1994, in the neighborhood of Englewood, on the south side of Chicago, a worker was outside cleaning up behind a liquor store and when he went to the dumpster to put the garbage in, he found the proboscis o f an African American cleaning lady who was badly beaten.\r\nWhen the womanhood was identified, the found out that she was a prostitute and her bid was Nina Glover. At the scene of the crime, the policed interviewed a male who was a resident of the neighborhood, his name was insurrectionist Douglas. He denied that he knew the victim so the police let him go. straightaway four months after finding this woman in the dumpster, the police had no leads only when someone called them and gave them a tip, so they acted on it.\r\nThey arrested four African American teenagers, (Vincent Thames, Terrill Swift, Harold Richardson and Michael Saunders) for question and according to Detective James Cassidy, after interviewing the four, he state that all of them voluntarily confessed to the murder, utter that they all four took turns raping Nina Glover in advance they actually dispatch her. Now desoxyribonucleic acid testing excluded these four teenagers as the source of semen that was reco vered from Glover’s body, and all four sons claimed that the confessions that they had given had been coerced.\r\nSee more: how to lead off an essay\r\nEven with that said the boys were sentenced based on the signed statements with such detail that they had given most their involvement. In return the jury convicted them each a prison term that ranged up to 30 to 40 years each. The media and the world had given these four teenagers, a group name that would seem to last and fix on to them forever, the Englewood quaternity. In the year of 2010, two of the boys had quest advanced â€Å"STR” which deoxyribonucleic acid is testing that surveils a extensive with a database search of the genetic profiles f criminals. The test were fence by the garble County prosecutors because contending whatever was done, the trial tourist court judgments were said to be final. Finally, a judge hear about what was being asked, and he ordered it to be done and when he did, the result s came back in may and the results were stunning. The DNA matched a person that the cops had interviewed right at the crime scene when it happened, none other than Johnny Douglas. So, with that said and done, the four teenagers had to be ruled out and exonerated.\r\nAs the four young men now, families waited for them to come home, they were ready to give them a big find or so it seemed until the State’s lawyer Anita Alvarez announced that she would vigorously fight their release that they had alone been granted. Now Johnny Douglas was a man with a long history of preying on prostitutes. He besides had a rap sheet that was really astonishing: he had 38 credences, including murder and sexual assault. In the year 2008, someone shot him to death. There were a lot of questions after the exoneration of the four boys and some of those questions were seriously to be thought about?\r\nFor congressman: How did these four confess to crimes that they did not commit? why did the D NA testing take so long? Why has the state’s attorney of Cook County Anita Alveraz, persistently fought justice for the four? Last plainly not least, how could the teenagers have provided so many details about the crime if they didn’t commit it? Mean fleck, while all these questions surfaced, Alveraz had her own theory as to what happened at the scene of the crime. She tells us that she thinks that â€Å"Douglas had sex, unprotected with Glover, left her, without revile and later on she was raped and murdered by the Englewood four. Alveraz also said that â€Å"Douglas didn’t kill each other prostitute that he had ever been with, and that DNA license in and of itself isn’t always the â€Å" silver grey bullet” that it’s sometimes perceived to be! ” Where does this detective Cassidy fit into this? Well as I kept on reading this story, I realized that he was the detective that actually was the one questioning the four boys and what he said, was the reason they were convicted because he said they confessed to him. Well, turns out that old detective Cassidy also had a rap sheet of his own.\r\nIn 1994, the year before this case, the detective had taken a confession from and 11 year old African American boy who was supposed to murder an elderly white woman on the southwest side of Chicago. A federal judge listened to the confession and concluded that his statement had been coerced and the conviction was tossed out the door and the judge ordered the youngster’s record to be immediately expunged. over again in 1998, detective Cassidy was back, now this time he had another high profile confession with 2 African American boys ages 7 and 8.\r\nThey admitted killing and 11 year old Ryan Harris and dumping her body out in a backyard. All of this is what Cassidy claims that they said. These two confessions created a national furor over pre-adolescent crime until the political science found semen in the little daughter’s panties. They automatically dropped the charges and they did later on potent a confession from an adult male about this case. Now after all of this Cassidy is no seven-day able to be active on the force. They had him reassigned to the medical exam Examiner’s Office, and now his job is to obtain confessions from the recently departed.\r\nNow in my opinion, I would have told him to pack his stuff and go as far away from Cook County as possible and he is to never be able to practice law enforcement again. This story also hits home for me as well, my hubby was intricate in the wrong group of people, and he also lives in Cook County. He was involved in gang life and all of that, something happened (I’m not going to go into all the details) but to make a long story short, he also had to plead guilty to something that he did not do and he did the time for it.\r\nThe point here is, these boys were false accused and they were scared into a confession that they didn’t do but landed them into prison. So I have found out that 76 wrongful convictions in Cook County since the advent of DNA testing, 25 were based ion suspects admitting to crimes they didn’t commit, according to the effect on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University. So now the Englewood Four, as they’ve been dubbed, await a decisiveness by the prosecutors whether they will be re-tried or not. These Four men were cleared by DNA evidence that linked the state and the system to a calling criminal in this particular crime.\r\n'