Brain Drain In The Philippine Education

Developing nations ar grappling with a phenomenon that started taking establish in the 1960s and in the 70s. A look at close to countries in Asia indicates make upd levels of inflow towards the developed western nations. According to a report released by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Asia is losing billions of dollars in term of nous debilitate as its highly skilled workforce and professionals argon leaving their countries in droves towards the developed countries for a more rewarding pay. India has addled IT professionals renowned for their computing intelligence.China too has lost people of expertise with about two thirds of students studying abroad failing to return to their motherland. The list of countries pitiable from brain drain runs long, the causes are deep-seated and the implications are inadvertently noisome to the nations economies. Of special concern in this paper is the font of Filipinos whose procreation sector has had adverse make d ue to the increased locate of brain drain amongst teachers. A look at the pattern of bray movement from Philippines to other nations reveals that it has undergone interesting metamorphosis with progressive adverse effects on the economy.Brain drain is a phenomenon that started in the archean seventies though non in large droves experienced today. Becurtain call then settle down as Florian and Danilo (2003) note, the movement of highly skilled Filipino professionals though world-shaking was principally a clandestine initiative among workers and their placement abroad. In the early seventies and the 80s, majority of the Philippines were heading to the Middle East at a mere number of 36, 035 in 1975. This figure until now would rise importantly to 214,590 in 1980 and to over 791 000 contract workers in 1998 (Florian & Danilo, 2003).The influx of teachers abroad is as a resultant effect of the push and pull factors between the immigration and the emigration countries. These push factors may range from lack of interlocking opportunities as well as the pursuit of a better life and biography progression. The unemployment rate in the recent years has ranged between 7 and 11 % and has been the force behind the massive brain drain. Philippines economy is based on a rocky foundation fuelled by agriculture, remittances from abroad and industries that are still in their formative st fester. Unemployment is rife and the influx experienced is in the ring to escape this.Philippines economy possesses a limited capacity to absorb little than a million people in terms of employment. This is a venial number compared to the high number of graduates and semi skilled personnel it is producing each year. The prospects of employment in foreign lands are a comforting respite to umpteen. A look at the recent educational trends reveals that the country pool of skilled professionals and graduates has been on the rise. The country produced over three million graduates i n the 90s ranging from dissimilar professions although the bulk of this was in the business related courses.A significant proportion of this comprised of teachers which has been of the just about affected profession in terms of brain drain. According to the officials in the education sector, education in Philippines is undergoing a crisis as a impart consequence of brain drain. This is not a problem that affect works at the formative level but according to J. Florendo B. , even the universities where compensation packages and school environment are considered competitive enough by Philippines standards are not exempt from the lure of overseas employment. (2008) A look at the influx of teachers from Philippines reveals a worrisome trend. It is a clear indication of the situation on the ground. According to the figures released by the Philippine all overseas Employment Statistics, there were as few as 112 teachers that transmigrated in search for greener pastures in 1992. This f igure was however to increase rapidly in the coming ten years. J. Florendo B. L. notes that between 1992 and 2002 2289 teachers were deployed abroad. A significant portion of this went to the United States at 45. 2 %.These figures however interrelate to contract workers and fail to capture the total number of teachers that emigrated. According to the kick on Filipino overseas, there was a total of 9,608 emigrant teachers from 1988 to 2001. (J. Florendo, 2008. ) Over 75% of these teachers moved to the United States. 20 % of all emigrants are skilful teachers which leaves Philippines with no sources of teachers to replace those that are moving. Unemployment rates apart, the meager wage awarded to many even in lucrative professions is a lead cause to the emigration.In private schools, teachers earn less than 400 us dollars while their counterparts in the populace schools at an entry level take home close to 230 US dollars a month. This is a meager marrow compared to over four ra ilway yard dollars a month in the United States (J. Florendo B. , 2008). The working conditions of the popular schools hasten also exacerbated the need to search for greener pastures. Public schools in Philippine are in a sorry state, largely overcrowded and the inherent corruption crosswise the bureaucracy hinders the emergence of any chance for career progression.The inability of the Philippines economy to absorb trained graduate teachers in the public school has not helped either. Philippine produces over 30 thousand teachers at the elementary and secondary level but only a pull out of this number is a absorbed into the public schools. With the huge percentage increase in graduates, the government has only been able to increase its rate by a mere 1. 7 percent creating an oversupply in legal teachers and then the emigration Remuneration prospects apart, the proficiency of most Filipinos in side of meat makes them attractive in overseas markets.According to Robert et al posi tion continues to dominate the Philippines educational system. He also notes that English language has been seriously cultivated for non literary academic purposes since the bilingual education policy of 1974. The fluency in English hence places Philippines professions at a higher competitive level compared to their counterparts crossways Asia. (1999) Brain drain across all the professions though it has had some affirmative contributions, is has adversely affected Philippines economy. The most affected is the education sector. Brain drain in the long run is detrimental to the economy in general.As Michel et al (2001) notes, migration of people endowed with a high level of human capital-the so called brain drain is detrimental for the country of emigration. This has been the case of Philippines especially in some of the selected sectors. Ronald Meinarchs points out clearly that the more and better educated a people the greater the chances of economic development. Whereas Philip pines may be producing professionals through its clear up system of training and education, the bulk of this population is not directly sound to its economy as it immediately emigrates in search of jobs and greener pastures(2003).As a fore mentioned, Philippines is grappling with an acute shortage of qualified and effective teachers. The best teachers in the sector have all fled the country towards the developed nations. This has led to a decline in the quality of education. It is to be noted that most of the teachers that emigrate to north America are the best in the market considering that recruitment standards in the United States are elaborate and require high credentials. utmost schools are the most affected as the teachers there have a mastery of what they teach.It becomes hard for the department of education in Philippines to fill more than(prenominal) posts with suitable replacements in a country where almost all professionals are on the run. It is important to note th at there is an undeniable fact on the positive attributes of brain drain in Philippines especially the remittances that have contributed vastly to the economy. These remittances from abroad amount to over us $ 8. 5 billion annually which is almost 10 % of the whole Philippines GDP.It is not however clear how much of this amount is from teachers that work in North America but it is unvarnished that their remittances are not channeled towards improving the quality of education at home. in that location are a number of steps that should be taken to send for the detrimental impact of brain drain in the educational sector. sequence it is not possible to restrict the emigration of labor in this age of globalization, the government should lump teachers together with pilots terming them as possessing critical skills. This will hence require them to work in the country for a certain stop consonant of measure before they emigrate.This will give the government ample time to train repla cements. It is a major concern to note that Philippine, though brain drain subsidizes the developed countries cost of educating and training professionals. Philippine spends colossal amount of resources to nurture personnel only for them to emigrate at the nick of time. To repair education, the government should spend a considerable amount of the remittances to improve the education system as well as providing tax incentives to encourage remittances.ReferencesRobert B. Kaplan, Richard B. Baldauf, 1999. talking to Planning in Malawi, Mozambique and the Philippines. Multilingual Matters Jo. Florendo B. Lontoc, A May-June 2008. Situation on Philippine Education University of the Philippines. Volume 9 Number 3. http//www. up. edu. ph/upforum. php? i=94 Ronald Meinardus, June 30, 2003. The Crisis of Public Education in the Philippines Business World Internet magnetic declination http//www. fnf. org. ph/liberalopinion/crisis-public-education-philippines. htm Cecil Morella, April 23, 20 05. Medical brain drain threat to Philippines The Standard. http//www. thestandard. com. hk/stdn/std/World/GD23Wd04. htmlMigration and the push Market in Asia Recent Trends and Policies Organisation for Nihon Rodo Kyokai, 2003. scotch Co-Operation and Development, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Publishing. Florian A. Albura, Danilo I Abella, 2003. Developing countries study on Philippines. International Programme. International dig up Office Geneva. Michel Beine, Frederic Docquier and Hilel Rapport, 2001. Brain drain and economic growth Theory and evidence. diary of development Economics. Vol 64 (275-289) Andrew Mountford, 1997. Can a brain drain be good for growth in the source economy? Journal o